← Back to Blog

How to Talk About Pacing, Plot, and Characters (Even If You're Not a Writer)

By Jenna Park·

We hear this from new BookmarkBug readers all the time: "I know what I felt, but I don't know how to say it."

That's completely normal. Most of us talk about books in casual shorthand — "it was good," "it was slow," "I loved the main character." Fine at a dinner table. But when an author is paying for your honest reading experience, it helps to get more specific. You don't need a literature degree. You just need a handful of plain-language ways to describe what happened inside your head while you were reading.

Think of this guide as a phrase book for a language you already speak.

Pacing

Pacing is how fast or slow the book feels. Not page count — momentum. It's the reason you either keep turning pages or start checking how many chapters are left.

Pacing problems tend to cluster in predictable spots. Beginnings that take too long to get going. Middles that sag once the initial hook wears off. Endings that either rush the resolution or keep going long after the climax. You don't need to diagnose why it felt off — just notice where it happened.

Things you might say:

  • "The first few chapters hooked me, but it slowed around chapters 8 through 12 — I had to push myself to keep reading."
  • "The ending was rushed. The last fifty pages tried to resolve three storylines and I wanted more time with each."
  • "I read the last 100 pages in one sitting. Whatever happened at the lake house chapter — that's when the book grabbed me."
  • "It took about five chapters before I felt invested. I almost put it down around chapter 3. But once the letter arrived, I was hooked."

Pro tip: If you can name the specific chapter where you drifted or got pulled back in, that's gold. You don't need to explain the craft problem. Just say "this is where I started skimming" or "this is where I started reading faster."

Every time you say "I couldn't put it down," you're already talking about pacing. Just write it down.

Plot

Plot is what happens — events, conflict, turning points, surprises. When you give feedback on plot, you're telling the author whether the story made sense, kept you interested, and came together in a satisfying way.

Pay attention to a few things: Did the surprises make sense when you looked back? Did you always understand what was at stake? Did the resolution feel earned, or did it feel like a shortcut? And if you got lost — even briefly — that's important. The author already knows the whole story. They can't see the gaps the way you can.

Things you might say:

  • "I saw the twist coming — the phone call in chapter 4 basically gave it away."
  • "The ending didn't feel earned. The huge problem was resolved by a coincidence in the last chapter."
  • "The mystery worked really well. I had a theory, I was wrong, but when I found out what actually happened it made perfect sense."
  • "There were plot threads that never got resolved. I'm still wondering about the missing notebook."
  • "The stakes felt low. I wasn't sure what would happen if the main character failed, so I didn't feel much tension."

Pro tip: If you misunderstood something, that's just as valuable as catching a real gap. It means the author didn't communicate it clearly. Don't second-guess yourself.

Characters

Characters are usually what readers react to most strongly. Authors want to know: Did they feel like real people? Could you tell them apart? Did you understand their motivations? And the big one — did you care? If a character was in danger, were you worried? If you felt nothing, that's important to mention.

It's also fine to dislike a character on purpose. The question isn't "did I like this person?" It's "did they feel real, and did my reaction feel intentional on the author's part?" There's a big difference between a character who's meant to be frustrating and one who's frustrating because they weren't written well.

Things you might say:

  • "I liked the main character but didn't understand what she wanted. She drifted from scene to scene without a clear goal."
  • "The villain felt one-dimensional — just evil for the sake of it. I wanted to understand what made him this way."
  • "I couldn't tell the two brothers apart. Their voices sounded the same and I kept getting confused about who was who."
  • "I was rooting for her the whole time. When things went wrong in chapter 15, I actually felt sick."
  • "The character's growth felt gradual and real, not sudden. I believed the change."

Pro tip: Your emotional reaction is the data. "I just didn't care about him" is a complete piece of feedback. But if you can point to the moment where you started or stopped caring, that's even better.

Dialogue

Good dialogue sounds natural — it has the rhythm of real conversation. Bad dialogue sounds like no human would ever say that. It takes you out of the story immediately.

Watch for two things especially. First, do all the characters sound the same? In real life, people talk differently — some are terse, some ramble, some use slang. Second, do characters explain things to each other they'd obviously already know? If two siblings are chatting and one says, "As you know, our mother was a famous opera singer who moved us to Italy," that's not how people talk. You'll feel it even if you can't name the problem.

Things you might say:

  • "The banter between the two leads was one of the best parts. It felt effortless and fun."
  • "Some of the romantic dialogue felt stiff — more like speeches than things someone would actually say."
  • "The argument in chapter 9 was incredible. Messy and real — they were talking past each other the way people actually do."
  • "Every character sounded the same. Without dialogue tags, I couldn't have told who was speaking."

Pro tip: Imagine someone saying the line out loud. If you can't picture a real person saying those words, the dialogue probably needs work.

"It took me out of the story" is one of the most useful things you can tell an author. Note where and why.

Setting and Atmosphere

Setting is where and when. Atmosphere is how the book feels— dark, cozy, tense, dreamy. Together they create the world you step into when you open the book.

The question isn't whether there's enough description — it's whether the setting feels present enough for the kind of story being told. And for atmosphere, ask whether the tone stayed consistent and matched the genre. A cozy mystery should feel warm even when bad things happen. A thriller should make you uneasy even in quiet moments.

Things you might say:

  • "I could picture the small town clearly. The descriptions put me right there."
  • "The setting felt generic — could have been anywhere. I never got a strong sense of place."
  • "The atmosphere was great — creepy and unsettling throughout. Even normal scenes felt like something was slightly wrong."
  • "The tone shifted a lot between chapters. I wasn't sure if the book was trying to be funny or serious."

Pro tip: If you're skimming descriptions, that's feedback. If you're pausing to re-read a beautiful passage, that's also feedback.

Emotional Experience

This might be the most important type of feedback you can give. Authors are trying to make you feel something, and they often have no idea if it's working until a real reader tells them.

Think about the big moments — a death, a betrayal, a confession. Did they land? Or did you read a scene that was obviously supposed to be devastating and feel... nothing? Both reactions are equally valuable to share.

Things you might say:

  • "I actually cried during the hospital scene. Didn't expect that."
  • "The death in chapter 14 didn't hit me. I think I didn't know that character well enough to feel the loss."
  • "The book told me the character was heartbroken, but I didn't feel it. The emotion was described rather than shown."
  • "The ending was satisfying emotionally, even though it wasn't a happy one. It felt right for these characters."

Pro tip: Don't be embarrassed about strong reactions. If you cried, say so. If you laughed out loud, say so. These reactions are exactly what authors want to hear about.

Writing Style and Believability

Writing style is just how the author puts words together. Some books are easy to read — the sentences flow, you forget you're reading. Others are harder — long tangled sentences, repetitive phrases, vocabulary that feels unnecessarily complicated. You're not being asked to copyedit. Just describe how it felt to read.

For believability, every book creates its own rules — even fantasy. A dragon can be believable. What breaks believability is when a character suddenly has a skill they've never shown, or a problem is resolved by coincidence, or someone behaves in a way that contradicts everything we know about them.

Things you might say:

  • "The writing flowed well. I never had to re-read a sentence to understand it."
  • "Some sentences were so long I lost the thread by the end of them."
  • "The author described the same things too many times. I got that she had green eyes — didn't need reminding every chapter."
  • "I didn't buy that she forgave him that quickly. After everything he did, it felt too easy."
  • "The coincidence at the end — them just happening to be at the same restaurant — felt too convenient."
  • "Everything felt grounded and real, even the parts that were clearly heightened for drama."

Pro tip: If you notice a pattern the author keeps repeating — a word they overuse, a habit like starting every chapter with weather — mention it. Authors are often blind to their own tics.

Being Honest Without Being Harsh

The author signed up for this. They want honest feedback and they're paying for it. But there's a difference between honest and cruel. Keep feedback focused on your experience. "I got bored in the middle" is honest and useful. "The middle is badly written" is a judgment that's harder to act on.

Simple framework: say what you experienced, say where it happened, and if you have any idea why, mention that too. "I lost interest around chapter 10 — I think the main conflict had been resolved but the book kept going, and I wasn't sure what I was reading toward anymore." That's complete, honest, kind, and incredibly actionable.

And don't forget what worked. Authors need to know what to keep just as much as what to fix. Positive feedback isn't flattery when it's specific — it's data.

A Quick Cheat Sheet

Not sure where to start? Run through whichever of these feel relevant:

  • Where did the book hook me? Where did it lose me?
  • Did the story make sense? Anything confuse me?
  • Which characters felt real? Who did I care about most?
  • Did the dialogue sound natural?
  • Could I picture the setting? Did the tone stay consistent?
  • Did the emotional moments land?
  • Was the writing easy to read, or did I find myself skimming?
  • Was there anything I didn't believe?
  • Did the beginning pull me in? Did the ending satisfy me?

Here's what you might not realize: you already know how to do this. Every time you tell a friend "it was good but the ending was weird," you're giving feedback on plot. Every time you say "I didn't buy that she'd go back to him," you're talking about character motivation and believability.

The only difference is you're writing it down and being a little more specific. Instead of "it was slow," you say where. Instead of "I loved her," you say what you loved. Instead of "the ending was weird," you say what felt weird about it.

That's it. Be specific. Be honest. Trust your instincts. You're not pretending to be a literary critic. You're something much more valuable — a real reader, telling an author exactly what it was like to spend time inside their book.